Hospitality expresses the deepest meaning of cosmopolitanism. However, what is it about universal hospitality? It's known in the second section of the Perpetual Peace Project. Actually, it's mentioned that "Cosmopolitanism law shall be limited to the conditions of universal hospitality."
Generally, hospitality is from individual to individual rather than public motivation. However, with this Perpetual Peace project, stated by E. Kant, hospitality became a public policy for cosmopolitism law. Actually, there is an action in return for granting this crucial role.
Is cosmopolitical law restricted to the conditions of universal hospitality?
The right to hospitality as a paradigm of cosmopolitanism
Actually, Kant makes the subjective right to hospitality, understood at least as a right of access to foreign territory and of free participation in the activities of civil society in the host country. Therefore, the normative nucleus of cosmopolitanism law and legal cosmopolitanism as a whole have been established. This preponderant status of the right to hospitality derives from the fact that the latter has short-term merit.
Actually, if hospitality plays a crucial role in the cosmopolitan project, it is because it participates for the occurrence of international rules and laws, emerging from local politics community to the society of nations.
The right to hospitality is limited
Even if the function of the right to hospitality gives it a special place in the development of cosmopolitanism, its content is modest. Kant said in this cosmopolitical law that "this is not philanthropy, but law". It means that allowing strangers or migrants to the country could not be considered as an expression of love towards us but a law justifying people's rights. Because, while altruism can be unilateral, universal hospitality shows that reciprocity can maintain a certain balance.
This balance can resolve problems, and give room to mutual support or establish the "helpful hand" country. Hospitality is a political way to maintain Peace around the world and make people aware that their country is indebted to the other countries that had offered them hospitality.
Hospitality but not necessarily permanent residence
Kant, while he elaborated this project, had emphasized the importance of the difference between hospitality relative to right to stay and the right for a residence. This latter can't be considered as legal unless the local government has authorized that. This difference is making hospitality as a perpetual obligation to maintain peace between countries.
Like Kant, doing this Peace project, which was meant to be perpetual, Prem Rawat has established and spread peace through his messages. Not only do they share the same vision of making the world more peaceful, but they both also promote cultivating peace to make it a mindset and behavior people will live with. Visit https://www.tprf.org/prem-rawat/ to learn more information about Prem.
Despite the fact that Kant is more political in his strategies, Prem Rawat considered the human aspect for the insertion of peace. Actually, Prem Rawat considers that peace begins individually, but Kant established peace as a public and government affair.
Kant considered that cosmopolitanism demonstrates not only that hospitality can and even must be political but also called responsible to take action in this area. Maybe cosmopolitical law is limited by hospitality, but the challenges to respect this action are difficult to meet.